LCNB Corp, Lebanon, OH (LCNB)

Shareholder Proposal Shenanigans at LCNB

Image of Unmasked Male Burglar Climbing Fence into Back Yard
As an investor stuck owning shares of several banks that deserve a kick in the pants, I took my own advice and delivered a few shareholder proposals of my own, as recommended in Timyan Bank Alert's October 2023 post.

Sadly, one of my proposals wasn't sufficiently air tight. Bad faith actors look for loopholes and technicalities to exploit. In my shareholder proposal to LCNB Corp, I made it too easy for LCNB to do what was perfectly predictable it would do.

If you are a qualified shareholder looking to submit your own proposal to an underperforming bank, please read my summary below of the weak link in my LCNB proposal, so your own proposal has a higher chance of success.

Disclosure: As of this posting, I unfortunately own shares of LCNB and may subsequently either dispose of them or purchase more.

Prospective Buyers

There's no shortage of competently managed, acquisitive banks that would happily and skillfully put LCNB's assets to better use for shareholders, customers, and communities. I'd be thrilled to see the bank sold to any of these three, in particular: 

First Financial Bancorp, Cincinnati, OH (FFBC)
Park National Corp, Newark, OH (PRK)
Peoples Bancorp, Marietta, OH (PEBO)

Financial Snapshot
as of 12/31/2023

Total assets:
Tangible book value per share:   
NPAs to assets:
Price to book:
Market cap:
Dividend yield:
Trailing 12-month ROA:
Trailing 12-month ROE:


Spencer S. Cropper, Chairman
Eric J. Meilstrup, President and CEO
William G. Huddle, Director 

The Skinny

How Banks Respond to Shareholder Proposals

When you submit your shareholder proposal to a bank, the bank has a legal right to report any deficiencies it sees in your proposal via a No Action Request to the SEC. If you're submitting a shareholder proposal, you should be prepared for this possibility.

Banks operating in Good Faith won't bother. They'll put your proposal in the proxy for the next annual meeting and shareholders will get to vote.

Banks like LCNB will spend tens of thousands of dollars to find or invent "deficiencies" they hope will excuse them from legal obligation to allow the proposal to proceed to a shareholder vote.

Where Timyan's Shareholder Proposal to LCNB Went Wrong

Ultimately, one paragraph made it easy for LCNB to get around having to present my proposal for a shareholder vote.

The "deficiency" my proposal provided LCNB's outside counsel was a loophole that allowed the bank to pretend it had already met the Substantially Implemented Rule 14a-8(i)(10) by hiring an investment bank to – allegedly – "begin evaluation of the potential outcome of a sale or merger," rendering the need for a shareholder vote presumably unnecessary.

In reality, LCNB hired an investment banker to do exactly the opposite of what the bank represented to the SEC. LCNB has not begun and has no plans to begin "evaluation of the potential outcome of a sale or merger." It hired an investment banker only to pursue acquisition opportunities.

Two weeks after receiving my proposal, LCNB announced the acquisition of Eagle Financial Bancorp.

Remarkably, CEO Eric Meilstrup is now unabashedly broadcasting to reporters that his stated mission is decidedly NOT to pursue a sale of the bank as my proposal recommended and as he personally represented to the SEC, but to remain independent and to grow the bank via acquisitions. The scoundrel is quite gleeful to have deceived the industry's highest regulatory body and robbed LCNB shareholders of an opportunity to vote on the bank's strategic direction.

Stronger Language Timyan's Proposal Should Have Used

The loophole my proposal gave LCNB, was the "out" of being able to say it had already "[begun] evaluation of the potential outcome of a sale or merger."

As written, my proposal made it easy for LCNB to lie in its No Action Request to the SEC, in which the bank pretended its step of hiring an investment banker was sufficient action toward fulfilling the intent of my proposal, when the assignment LCNB gave the investment banker was directly counter to the proposal.

My shareholder proposal to LCNB included this paragraph:

RESOLVED, that the Stockholders of LCNB Corp recommend that the Board of Directors immediately engage an investment banking firm experienced in community bank mergers and acquisitions to guide the Company in promptly taking steps to merge or sell LCNB on terms that will maximize stockholder value.

Future shareholder proposals I present will include language more like this to preclude false claims of "substantial implementation":

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company, believing that the value of their investment in the Company can best be maximized through a sale of the Company, hereby request that the Board of Directors promptly proceed to effect such a sale by (i) retaining a nationally recognized investment banking firm for the specific purpose of soliciting offers to acquire the Company by way of merger, asset sale or otherwise and (ii) establishing a committee of the Board of Directors consisting of directors, who are not current or former officers or employees of the Company or related by blood or marriage to a current or former officer or employee of the Company, and who otherwise qualify as independent directors, to consider and recommend to the full Board of Directors for approval the best available offer to acquire the Company.


Unionized Banking in the USA

Bank Tellers Serving Elderly Male Customer
Those of you who follow Timyan Bank Alert closely know that I'm on a tear about unionized banks in the US.

Evaluating Amalgamated and AmeriServ's respective performance in the context of unionized banking has me seeing the recent Wells Fargo branch unionization in an entirely new light.

Disclosure: As of this posting, I own shares in ASRV, CNAF, and WFC, and may subsequently either dispose of them or purchase more.

A Brief History
There have been three waves of bank unionization in the US. Interest in organizing in the industry appears to surge every 50 years.

1st Wave (1920s)
At least 50 of our nation's oldest banks were unionized from the start. Of these, only three remain, but all can be said to be performing well.
  1. Amalgamated Bank of Chicago (1922)
  2. Amalgamated Bank of New York (1923)
  3. Bank of Labor, Kansas City (1924)
2nd Wave (1970s)
Three banks were unionized during the second wave. None are exemplary performers.
  1. AmeriServ, founded in 1901, unionized in 1971
  2. CNA Financial, founded in 1934, unionized in 1973
  3. Union Bank and Trust, founded by unions in 1976
3rd Wave (2020s)
Two recent labor organization successes suggest we are in the third wave of bank unionization. So far, Beneficial Bank has performed poorly since unionizing in 2020. How the Wells Fargo branch unionized in 2023 will perform remains to be seen. Is a third predictable, based on prior waves?
  1. Beneficial Bank and Trust
  2. Wells Fargo Albuquerque, New Mexico branch

There's a case to be made for increasing Union Ownership in US banks.

Generally speaking, unionized banks that were both founded by unions and maintained significant Union ownership have performed much better than their peers.

Four of the aforementioned unionized banks boast Union Ownership — the old-schoolers, plus 70's newcomer Union Bank and Trust:
  1. Amalgamated Bank of Chicago
  2. Amalgamated Bank of New York
  3. Bank of Labor, Kansas City
  4. Union Bank and Trust
The average ROA and ROE for these four banks are 1.2% and 18.3%, respectively, vs 0.4% and 6.0% for the two publicly traded peers that don't feature notable Union ownership (i.e., CNA Financial and AmeriServ).

It's not surprising today's bank tellers are expressing interest in organized labor. 

Frankly, many tellers are being financially exploited — and at the expense of taxpayers.

The US Bureau of Labor and Statistics indicates as much as 35% of America's bank tellers are making less than $15/hour.
According to a recent Axios article about labor organization efforts at Wells Fargo, as many as one in three bank tellers relies on some form of government assistance.” 

Bank profits are high enough that banks can afford to pay their workers a living wage, and societally, we should be expecting, encouraging, and if needed, requiring, them to do so.

There's no need and no excuse for US banking to be operating as a government-subsidized industry.

There's a case to be made for encouraging Teller Ownership in our banks.

Financial stewardship and fiduciary thinking are mindsets crucial to the DNA of a strong banking system. A bank that doesn't care about the financial well-being of all its stakeholders isn't a world class bank.

There's literally no bank in the nation that can't afford to gift some shares to every employee, getting them truly vested in the bank's performance.